KLOW is not a single compound. It is a trade name for a research blend of four peptides, sold most often as an 80 mg lyophilized vial divided roughly into 50 mg GHK-Cu, 10 mg BPC-157, 10 mg TB-500 and 10 mg KPV. That split is what suppliers market; no regulated or standardized composition exists, and ratios may differ by source. The name has no chemical or pharmacological standing, and appears to extend an earlier three-peptide blend by adding KPV. Being a mixture rather than a molecule, KLOW has no sequence and no molecular weight of its own.
The components are genuinely peptides but otherwise unrelated in origin, size and mechanism. GHK-Cu is the copper(II) complex of glycyl-histidyl-lysine (Gly-His-Lys), a sequence occurring endogenously in human plasma; the free tripeptide is 340.38 g/mol and the neutral 1:1 complex 401.91 g/mol, though quoted values are representation-dependent (~403.9 g/mol is common). BPC-157 is a synthetic 15-residue peptide, GEPPPGKPADDAGLV, 1419.5 g/mol, corresponding to the N-terminal region of body protection compound, a protein present in human gastric juice, first described by Sikiric and colleagues in 1993. No residue numbering is established in the primary literature, it shows no homology with known intestinal peptides, and no free BPC-157 fragment is known to occur naturally in humans. KPV is Lys-Pro-Val, 342.43 g/mol, the C-terminal tripeptide of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone.
What “TB-500” actually refers to
FDA names the substance “Thymosin beta-4, fragment (LKKTETQ), also known as TB-500”: the synthetic acetylated heptapeptide Ac-LKKTETQ, about 889 g/mol, residues 17–23 of mature thymosin beta-4. In practice much of the research-supply market ships full-length thymosin beta-4, a 43-residue peptide of approximately 4963 g/mol, under the same label. These are chemically distinct molecules with different molar content per milligram, different pharmacokinetics and regulatory histories, and a vial labelled only “TB-500” does not disclose which is present — an ambiguity that carries into the blend.
The evidence base for the blend is empty: no published study has administered these four compounds together, and the rationale for combining them is mechanistic plausibility rather than tested effect. Regulatory status is frequently misstated: all four were previously in Category 2 of FDA’s interim bulk-substances policy, but on the listing current 22 April 2026 none remains there, each appearing instead under bulk substances nominated but withdrawn — withdrawn by the nominators, which is not approval or endorsement. None is approved for human use by FDA or any comparable regulator; these materials are handled as research chemicals for laboratory investigation only.